Important Judgements

Access landmark legal judgements with expert analysis and commentary

Recent Judgements

Sort by:

K.S. Puttaswamy vs Union of India (2017)

Right to Privacy Judgement - Supreme Court of India

Constitutional Law Privacy Rights Fundamental Rights

The Supreme Court unanimously held that the right to privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. This landmark judgement overruled previous decisions that held privacy was not a fundamental right.

Case Details

  • Case No: WP (Civil) No. 494 of 2012
  • Date: August 24, 2017
  • Bench: 9-Judge Bench
  • Cited: 1,240 times

Navtej Singh Johar vs Union of India (2018)

Section 377 Judgement - Supreme Court of India

Human Rights LGBTQ+ Rights Constitutional Law

The Supreme Court decriminalized consensual homosexual acts between adults by striking down parts of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. The court held that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.

Case Details

  • Case No: WP (Criminal) No. 76 of 2016
  • Date: September 6, 2018
  • Bench: 5-Judge Bench
  • Cited: 872 times

Shayara Bano vs Union of India (2017)

Triple Talaq Judgement - Supreme Court of India

Family Law Women's Rights Constitutional Law

The Supreme Court declared the practice of instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat) unconstitutional by a 3:2 majority. The court held that the practice is arbitrary and violates the fundamental rights of Muslim women under Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution.

Case Details

  • Case No: WP (Civil) No. 118 of 2016
  • Date: August 22, 2017
  • Bench: 5-Judge Bench
  • Cited: 654 times

Indra Sawhney vs Union of India (1992)

Mandal Commission Case - Supreme Court of India

Constitutional Law Reservation Policy Social Justice

The Supreme Court upheld the implementation of the Mandal Commission's recommendations for 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in government jobs, while capping total reservations at 50%. The court also introduced the concept of "creamy layer" exclusion from reservation benefits.

Case Details

  • Case No: WP (Civil) No. 930 of 1990
  • Date: November 16, 1992
  • Bench: 9-Judge Bench
  • Cited: 1,892 times

Expert Analysis

Legal Analysis

Impact of Puttaswamy Judgement on Data Protection Laws

How the right to privacy judgement shaped India's approach to data protection and digital rights.

By Adv. Priya Sharma Read Analysis
Legal Analysis

25 Years of Mandal Commission Judgement

Retrospective analysis of how the landmark judgement transformed India's reservation policy.

By Prof. Rajesh Verma Read Analysis